Watch what AI says about you.
An audit is a photo; this is the security camera. AI engines change their answers constantly, and subscribers find out when it happens to them, along with what we recommend doing about it. The value of the subscription is the trend line, so the question set stays locked and the scoring stays identical, month after month.
What you get
The method
Re-run the locked matrix
The same queries, the same engines, the same CITED, MENTIONED, ABSENT or MISREPRESENTED scoring, with every response archived so the month is auditable.
Delta detection
Against last month: new citations won with the source page named, citations lost and investigated the same day, and any new misrepresentation treated as priority one.
Competitor movement
The cells where competitors gained, and the new or changed pages that earned them the citation you wanted.
Attribution honesty
When we won a citation we connect it to the optimization work only if the evidence supports it, and say engine drift when it does not. False attribution destroys the number that matters.
Action digest and trend line
At most three recommended actions, each evidence-linked and ready to hand to optimization or content, logged so your dashboard charts the line that is the point of the whole thing.
Who this is for, and who it is not
It is for brands that have run an AEO audit or optimization and want to hold the ground: SaaS, services, anyone whose buyers ask AI before they shortlist.
It is not for brands with no AI footprint yet; there is nothing to monitor and the digest would mostly report absence. Build presence first, then watch it with this.
What happens after you subscribe
Baseline month
Your matrix and competitor set are locked and the first full read becomes the baseline every future month compares to.
Every month
The matrix re-runs, deltas are found, and a human-reviewed digest lands in your dashboard.
Any day, if it matters
A new misrepresentation does not wait for month-end. You get an interim note the day we catch it.
Quarterly
A deeper re-audit comparison, so the long arc is as clear as the monthly line.
What this replaces
| Alternative | Typical cost | What you actually get |
|---|---|---|
| AI visibility tool subscriptions | $100 to $400/mo | Dashboards without a human read or a correction plan |
| Checking ChatGPT yourself | Free | One engine, no baseline, no alert when the answer changes overnight |
| Finding out from a lost deal | Expensive | The misrepresentation you never knew was costing you pipeline |
Questions, answered straight
Why monthly?
AI answers shift constantly. Monthly is frequent enough to catch changes and cheap enough to run forever.
What happens when you find a problem?
Misrepresentations get flagged immediately, not at month-end, with a correction plan attached.
Can I change the questions we track?
Additions get their own baseline any time. The core set stays fixed so your trend line stays honest.
Do I need an audit first?
The AEO Visibility Audit builds the matrix this re-tests. You can start at subscription time, but the audit makes month one far richer.
Which engines do you check?
ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Claude, with responses archived so every score is auditable.
Can I cancel anytime?
Yes, monthly subscriptions cancel from your billing page, no calls, no retention scripts.